Were the Twin Towers Attacks an Inside Job? One good move.

 

 


 

 

 1993.

 

Two incidents.

 

1993 was notable for two incidents. The January 13, 1993, "Water Buffalo" Incident, and the February 26, 1993 World Trade Center attack.
 
 

The book didn't treat the subject in a sufficiently serious and respectful way.  

 

I think we can all agree the February 26th incident was a right wing attack on a right wing institution.

 

The January 13th topic is so toxic description would better yet be precluded from mentionability. 

 

Twin Towers.

 

The towers I am referring too from here on are, the metaphoric and towering entities known as, the Republican Party, and the Democratic Party.

 

And we're alluding obliquely to 2001 by way of 1993 but actuality wise we're talking about 2016. And 2025.

 

The first plane flew into  the tower known as the "Party of Lincoln."

 

And the plane was Donald Trump. Or was piloted by Donald Trump, who coincidentally didn't know how to "land it." Etc. etc. shoose your metaphor.

 

The second plane, likewise flown by individual terrorists who knew neither how to take it off nor how to land it, was piloted by a "movement" or phenomenon whose very mention is again, precluded by manner and convention.

 

The tower was the Democratic Party.

 

For purposes of understanding, grokking, plenitude of comprehension, whatever it is,  Liberals are now shoved, tugged, in any possible perspective, position "on the left."  With "far leftists" however much denial erupts volcanic from every quarter, or fifth.

 

(Polygon of one's choice.) 

 

One good move?

 

I thought these things might be clues: 

 


 

I won't be the one to add the caption. 

 


... "the book didn't treat the subject in a sufficiently serious and respectful way."

 

 

... 

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The (Judith) Butler did it: Hoag's Hoax yet again.

Image
    "Sometimes all of our Thoughts are misgiven."       The peculiar theories of Judith Butler are based on a misinterpretation of what one might call synecdochally, " Schrödinger's Cat " ...   The link is to a short  video of the infamous "Ames Window," which like  Schrödinger's Cat is not to be taken at face value. It is a quirk of our viewpoint, of our evolutionary psychology, of our own perspective, not of the reality behind appearances.   The science fiction trope of "an indeterminate quantum fog" as philosophized on by such gigantic invertebrates of philosophy as Slavoj Žižek  has led us to the dead end of applied "social construction" theory. Misapplied to be the absolutely very least bit precise.   This amorphous nebulous Debussyan fog is where  (Judith) Butler makes/takes/gives/ misgives , her stand.   Where "they" make "their" stand as "they" would have it. The full book is here .    Ot...
Read more

Root Orange Ouroboros Theory.

Image
      Inexplicably the Trump phenomenon seemed to vomit itself into existence out of nothing, but Root Orange Ouroboros Theory is an idea that it was actually flying under the radar with a weaponized stealth issue kept in peripheral vision by distractions and constant deployment of so-called "orange herrings," red herrings as decoys, and "dog-whistles" so-called. For example the fashionable twitter "statue PfPs," and enigmatic ambiguously interpretable allusions to 'saving Western Civilization.'    To lay it all out, what lay underneath, the essence, or root of the orange ouroboros was a simple set of axioms, presumed to be self-evident. To the extent that they resonated, they helped conjure the unlikely fruit into existence like "clockwork," so to speak:   a) There ain't no such thing as a they/them.   b)  Nobody was "born in the wrong body."   c) The belief that one can be or that oneself is, is a mental illness.   d) T...
Read more